000			03229nab a22003377a 4500
650			_9252 _aFAMILY VIOLENCE
700			_9772 _aBellringer, Maria E.
700			_96206 _aDowling, Nicki A.
700			_96209 _aThomas, Shane A.
700			_96205 _aJackson, Alun C.
700			_91511 _aKoziol-McLain, Jane
999			_c5206 _d5206
005			20250625151420.0
008			161026t2013 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aSuomi, Aino _96204
245			_aProblem gambling and family violence : _b family member reports of prevalence, family impacts and family coping _c Aino Suomi, Alun C. Jackson, Nicki A Dowling, Tiffany Lavis, Janet Patford, Shane A Thomas, Peter Harvey, Max Abbott, Maria E. Bellringer, Jane Koziol-McLain and Sue Cockman
260			_bSpringer, _c2013
500			_aAsian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 2013, 3: 13 (Open access)
520			_aThere exists only a small number of empirical studies investigating the patterns of family violence in problem gambling populations, although some evidence exists that intimate partner violence and child abuse are among the most severe interpersonal correlates of problem gambling. The current article reports on the Australian arm of a large-scale study of the patterns and prevalence of co-occurrence of family violence and problem gambling in Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong. The current study screened 120 help-seeking family members of problem gamblers in a range of clinical services for both family violence and problem gambling. The main results showed that 52.5% reported some form of family violence in the past 12 months: 20.0% reported only victimisation, 10.8% reported only perpetration and 21.6% reported both victimisation and perpetration of family violence. Parents, current and ex-partners were most likely to be both perpetrators and victims of family violence. There were no gender differences in reciprocal violence but females were more likely to be only victims and less likely to report no violence in comparison to males. Most of the 32 participants interviewed in depth, reported that gambling generally preceded family violence. The findings suggest that perpetration of family violence was more likely to occur as a reaction to deeply-rooted and accumulated anger and mistrust whereas victimisation was an outcome of gambler’s anger brought on by immediate gambling losses and frustration. While multiple and intertwined negative family impacts were likely to occur in the presence of family violence, gambling-related coping strategies were not associated with the presence or absence of family violence. The implications of the findings for service providers are discussed. (Authors' abstract). Record #5206
650			_aPROBLEM GAMBLING _9464
651		4	_aAUSTRALIA _92597
700			_aLavis, Tiffany _96207
700			_aPatford, Janet _96208
700			_aHarvey, Peter _96210
700			_aAbbott, Max _9682
700			_aCockman, Sue _96211
773	0		_tAsian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 2013, 3: 13 (Open access)
830			_aAsian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health _96212
856			_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2195-3007-3-13
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE