000 | 02934nab a22003137a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250625151419.0 | ||
008 | 161019t2016 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aTaylor, Elizabeth _96185 |
||
245 |
_aNot all behind closed doors : _bexamining bystander involvement in intimate partner violence _cElizabeth Taylor, Victoria Banyard, John Grych and Sherry Hamby |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2016 |
||
500 | _aJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2016, Advance online publication, 18 October 2016 | ||
520 | _a"It is often said that intimate partner violence (IPV) happens “behind closed doors”; however, research on IPV and other crimes suggests that witnesses are sometimes present. This suggests that bystanders may be in a position to help victims or potential victims of violence. Bystander behavior has been studied primarily in school settings, and consequently, little is known about how often it occurs or what its effects may be in the broader community. This study examined IPV incidents in a rural sample to assess the presence and potential impact of bystanders on victim-reported outcomes. One thousand nine hundred seventy-seven adult participants completed a questionnaire that asked about five violent behaviors (my partner threatened to hurt me; pushed, grabbed, or shook me; hit me; beat me up; sexually assaulted me), bystander characteristics, and victim outcomes (fear; injury; disruption of daily routines; mental health). Adult or teen bystanders were present for each IPV approximately one third of the time, except in the case of sexual assault (14.3%). When a bystander was present, victims reported higher rates of injury, greater disruption in their routines, and poorer mental health. When a bystander’s safety was threatened, victims reported more physical injury and more routine disruption. A considerable number of IPV incidents do not happen behind closed doors, and the presence of a bystander was associated with worse outcomes for victims. Prevention efforts for adult IPV may need to take a more cautious or nuanced approach to encouraging bystander action, especially when confronted with more severe incidents. Bystander safety should be a priority for violence prevention." (Authors' abstract). Record #5195 | ||
650 |
_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
||
650 |
_aINTERVENTION _9326 |
||
650 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
||
650 | 5 |
_9439 _aPHYSICAL ABUSE |
|
650 | 5 |
_aRISK FACTORS _9505 |
|
650 | 5 |
_9508 _aRURAL AREAS |
|
651 | _2UNITED STATES | ||
650 | 4 |
_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531 |
|
700 |
_aBanyard, Victoria _96186 |
||
700 |
_aGrych, John _96187 |
||
773 | 0 | _tJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2016, Advance online publication, 18 October 2016 | |
700 |
_93264 _aHamby, Sherry L. |
||
830 |
_aJournal of Interpersonal Violence _94621 |
||
856 |
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260516673629 _yRead the abstract |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE |
||
999 |
_c5195 _d5195 |