000 01758nab a22003497a 4500
999 _c4643
_d4643
005 20250625151354.0
008 150323|2015 |xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aNaughton, Catherine M.
_94704
245 _a‘Ordinary decent domestic violence’ :
_ba discursive analysis of family law judges’ interviews
_cCatherine M. Naughton, Aisling T. O'Donnell, Ronni M. Greenwood, & Orla T. Muldoon
260 _bSage,
_c2015
500 _aDiscourse & Society, 2015, 26(3), 349–365.
500 _aRecommended reading
520 _aThis study examined judges’ constructions of the ‘best interests of the child’ in child custody and access arraignments where there were allegations of domestic violence within the context of an interview. Using interviews with six Irish District Court judges, a micro-structural discourse analysis enabled the identification of socio-cultural discourses, scientific knowledge and judges’ own values and beliefs biases about custody arraignments in cases of domestic violence. (from the abstract). Record #4643
650 5 _aRECOMMENDED READING
_96431
650 4 _aCONTACT (ACCESS)
_929
650 5 _aATTITUDES
_970
650 _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9203
650 _aFAMILY LAW
_9244
650 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
_9431
650 _aJUSTICE
_9333
650 4 _aVICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9624
650 4 _aCONTACT (ACCESS)
_929
651 _aIRELAND
_93457
700 _aO'Donnell, Aisling T.
_94705
700 _aGreenwood, Ronni M.
_94706
700 _aMuldoon, Orla T.
_94707
773 0 _tDiscourse & Society, 2015, 26(3), 349–365.
830 _aDiscourse & Society
_94708
856 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564738
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE