000			01915nab a2200337 c 4500
005			20250625151345.0
008			140715b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aDouglas, Heather _94154
245			_aStrangulation, domestic violence and the legal response _cHeather Douglas and Robin Fitzgerald
260			_bUniversity of Sydney, _c2014
500			_aSydney Law Review, 2014, 36: 231-254
520			_a"In risk assessment tools used by domestic violence workers and police, strangulation, short of causing death, is considered a ‘red flag’ for future serious abuse and fatality. This article discusses the risks and concerns associated with non-fatal strangulation and examines current legal responses to it in Australia, the United States and Canada. Drawing on a study of court files involving domestic violence protection orders, the authors consider how strangulation allegations made by those applying for protection orders are responded to by police and courts in Queensland. The authors conclude with a reflection on current policy and legislative approaches to non-fatal strangulation in Australia and make suggestions for law reform." (Authors' abstract). There is also reference to New Zealand.
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aJUSTICE _9333
650			_aLEGISLATION _9346
650			_aPHYSICAL ABUSE _9439
650		4	_aRISK ASSESSMENT _9504
650			_aSTRANGULATION _94941
650		4	_aVICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9624
651		4	_aAUSTRALIA _92597
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
651		4	_aUNITED STATES _92646
651		4	_aCANADA _92602
700			_aFitzgerald, Robin _94155
773	0		_tSydney Law Review, 2014, 36:231-254
830			_aSydney Law Review _94168
856			_uhttp://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_36/slr36_2/SLRv36n2DouglasFitzgerald.pdf
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE
999			_c4446 _d4446