000 01658nab a22002777a 4500
999 _c4167
_d4167
005 20250625151333.0
008 130703s2013 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aWall, Liz.
_93183
245 _aIssues in evaluation of complex social change programmes for sexual assault prevention
_cLiz Wall
260 _aMelbourne, Vic. :
_bAustralian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault,
_c2013
300 _a20 p.
300 _aelectronic document (20 p.): PDF; 1.14 MB; HTML available
490 0 _aACSSA issues
500 _aACSSA issues, 2013, no. 14
520 _aKey messages: ■The most valid, rigorous and reliable information for any evaluation is that which informs the stakeholders about what they need to know for prevention effectiveness. ■The complexity of multi-level interventions for sexual assault primary prevention may require consideration of new techniques for evaluating. ■Acceptance of innovative methods of evaluation is required at the policy and funding level to ensure progress towards effective assessment of primary prevention in sexual assault. ■ Evaluators should utilise an approach that best suits the evaluation question they are considering even if that requires innovative techniques.(from the website)
650 2 7 _aEVALUATION
_9236
650 2 7 _aPROGRAMMES
_9467
650 2 7 _9544
_aSOCIAL CHANGE
650 2 7 _9458
_aPREVENTION
650 2 4 _aSEXUAL VIOLENCE
_9531
651 4 _aAUSTRALIA
_92597
773 0 _tACSSA issues, 2013, no. 14
856 _uhttps://aifs.gov.au/resources/practice-guides/issues-evaluation-complex-social-change-programs-sexual-assault
942 _2ddc
_cBRIEFING