000 | 01556nab a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | FVC | ||
005 | 20250625151315.0 | ||
008 | 120411t2011 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aFVC | ||
100 |
_aWhitzman, Carolyn _92972 |
||
245 |
_aHalf-full or half-empty? _bplanning for women's safety in Victoria, Australia |
||
490 | 0 | _aPlanning Theory and Practice | |
500 | _aPlanning Theory and Practice, 2011, 12(3): 367–385 | ||
520 | _aOver the past two decades there has been an emerging international consensus that locally coordinated efforts are effective in addressing violence and insecurity. Promoting “women’s safety” has become a recognized international planning and governance strategy. There are, however, concerns about how the “women’s safety” approach can address intimate partner violence, incorporate diversity between women from different cultures, and integrate a gender mainstreaming approach to male on male violence. Finally, there are challenges in evaluating these initiatives. The paper will use the Gender, Local Governance, and Violence Prevention (GLOVE) research project in Victoria, Australia as a case study to examine these tensions. Abstract. | ||
650 | 2 | 7 |
_aGENDER _9269 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_aLOCAL GOVERNMENT _92973 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_aEVALUATION _9236 |
650 | 2 | 0 |
_aVIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN _93088 |
651 | 4 |
_aAUSTRALIA _92597 |
|
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9458 _aPREVENTION |
773 | 0 | _tPlanning Theory and Practice, 2011, 12(3): 367–385 | |
856 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2011.617496 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE |
||
999 |
_c3817 _d3817 |