000			02233nab a22003737a 4500
650	2	7	_9458 _aPREVENTION
610			_92605 _aWorld Health Organization
999			_c3646 _d3646
001			3646
003			FVC
005			20250625151307.0
008			111207t2011 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aFVC
100			_aAbramsky, Tanya. _92669
245			_aWhat factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? : _bfindings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence _c/ Charlotte Abramsky, Charlotte H. Watts, Claudia Garcia-Moreno, Karen Devries, Legia Kiss, Mary Ellsberg, Henrica AFM Jansen and Lori Heise
300			_a17 p.
490	0		_aBMC Public Health
500			_aBMC Public Health 2011, 11:109
500			_aRecommended reading
520			_aThe main findings, recently published in the open access journal BMC Public Health are that: • despite wide variations in the prevalence of IPV, many factors affect IPV risk similarly across sites. • as far as IPV is concerned, high socio-economic status (SES) and formal marriage offer protection to women. • alcohol abuse, cohabitation, young age, attitudes supportive of wife beating, having outside sexual partners and growing up with domestic violence increase the risk of IPV. • similarly, experiencing or perpetrating other forms of violence in adulthood increase the risk of IPV. • since risk of IPV is highest in younger women, schools are an important setting for primary prevention activities. • particularly, schools have the potential to address issues of relationships, gender roles, power and coercion within existing youth violence and bullying programmes.
650	2	7	_aRECOMMENDED READING _96431
650	2	7	_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650	2	7	_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650	2	7	_aRISK FACTORS _9505
700			_91200 _aGarcia-Moreno, Claudia
700			_aDevries, Karen. _92670
700			_aKiss, Ligia. _92671
700			_91102 _aEllsberg, Mary
700			_aJansen, Henrica _92672
700			_93535 _aHeise, Lori L.
700			_92292 _aWatts, Charlotte H.
773	0		_tBMC Public Health 2011, 11:109
856			_uhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/109
942			_cARTICLE _2ddc