000 | 02998nam a2200349Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 111316 | ||
005 | 20250625151251.0 | ||
008 | 110331s1998 eng | ||
040 |
_aWSS _dAFV |
||
100 |
_aLambie, Ian _91527 |
||
245 |
_aResiliency in the victim-offender cycle in male sexual abuse _cLambie, Ian |
||
260 | _c1998 | ||
300 | _a235 p. | ||
365 |
_a00 _b0 |
||
500 | _aThesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology. | ||
520 | _aThis study examined the moderating factors that stop a male victim of sexual abuse from entering the victim-offender cycle. A secondary purpose of the study was to identify possible reasons why men who are not victims of sexual abuse sexually offend. Three groups were interviewed as part of the study. A resilient group (47 participants), a victim-offender group (41 participants), and an offender group (50 participants). Significant differences were found between the sexually abused groups. Primarily the resilient group received more intra and inter-familial emotional and social support, had more peer friendships, were more educated, had fewer siblings, and were less likely to report sexual fantasies and sexual desire about young children, compared with both offender groups. The resilient group were more likely to internalise the effects of their sexual abuse, while the victim-offender group displayed more externalising effects, which included being physically abusive towards others. They were also more likely to report being abused by less than three offenders, and they were less likely to fantasise and masturbate about their own abuse. The resilient group reported receiving more emotional comfort from their abuse experience. The resilient group cited empathy for potential victims as the most common reasons for not sexually offending. There were also a small number of significant differences between the two sexually abused groups regarding their sexual abuse experience. The victim-offender group reported more external reasons for sexually offending, as opposed to the offender group who reported more internal reasons. The findings support the need for multifactorial models of resiliency, the victim-offender cycle, and sexual offending. Recommendations about the prevention of the victim-offender cycle are made, including the need for a thorough systemic assessment of all male victims of sexual abuse and the involvement of their family system in counselling.--AUTHOR'S ABSTRACT | ||
522 | _anz | ||
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aFAMILIES _9238 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aINTERVENTION _9326 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aMENTAL HEALTH _9377 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aNEGLECT _9401 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aOFFENDERS _9413 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aPHYSICAL ABUSE _9439 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aSTATISTICS _9575 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aTREATMENT _9613 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aVICTIMS _9622 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_aTHESES _9606 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9458 _aPREVENTION _2FVC |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9103 _aCHILD ABUSE _2FVC |
650 | 2 | 4 |
_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531 |
942 |
_2ddc _cTHESIS |
||
999 |
_c3330 _d3330 |