000 | 03110nam a2200361Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 33787 | ||
005 | 20250625151235.0 | ||
008 | 110331s2002 eng | ||
020 | _a0521521653 | ||
040 |
_aWSS _dAFV |
||
082 | 0 | _a364.68 RES | |
245 |
_aRestorative justice and family violence _cStrang, Heather; Braithwaite, John (eds.) |
||
260 |
_aCambridge, UK _bCambridge University Press _c2002 |
||
300 | _axi, 248 p. | ||
365 |
_a00 _b0 |
||
520 | _aChapters 5 and 12 of this book include discussions on restorative justice measures in relation to family violence in New Zealand. Allison Morris, the author of chapter 5, "Children and Family Violence: Restorative Messages from New Zealand", explores family violence and restorative measures for children and youth. The author argues that the conventional criminal justice system is not necessarily the ideal model for dealing with family violence. Family Group Conferencing as a restorative justice model is described and case examples utilised. The author argues that restorative practices have the potential for resolving family violence issues. Concerns about restorative justice measures, power imbalances, putting children at risk, the trivialising of abuse in the family, and perpetuation of negative attitudes are also explored. Ruth Busch, the author of chapter 12, "Domestic Violence and Restorative Justice Initiatives: Who Pays if We Get it Wrong", critically evaluates the historic debate surrounding the restorative justice practice of family mediation in cases of domestic violence. This chapter draws on international and New Zealand literature. The inadequacies of, and recent ameliorations to the Court system are explored. The ideas surrounding, and the issues of victim-offender mediation in cases of domestic violence, are discussed. The author cautions that there are gains from this model of practice, but that these gains should not overshadow the value of the court system because not all family violence issues can be resolved through mediation. The limitations of youth justice Family Group Conferences (FGC) and the limitations of FGCs in domestic violence offences are explored. The case of Craig Manukau is discussed as a cautionary note on FGCs. The chapter then discusses the adaptation of New Zealand's FGC process in Australia, Newfoundland and Labrador, and community group conferencing and domestic violence. The author concludes that a culture of safety is needed in cases of domestic violence. | ||
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aADOLESCENTS _943 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aCHILD NEGLECT _9114 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aCHILDREN _9127 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aCOMMUNITIES _9142 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aFAMILIES _9238 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aHOMICIDE _9297 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aJUSTICE _9333 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aLEGISLATION _9346 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aOFFENDERS _9413 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aRESTORATIVE JUSTICE _9502 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9431 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _2FVC |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9103 _aCHILD ABUSE _2FVC |
700 | 1 |
_aStrang, Heather _92163 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aBraithwaite, John _9814 |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cBOOK |
||
999 |
_c3005 _d3005 |