000			04202nam a2200481Ia 4500
999			_c2909 _d2909
001			112837
005			20250625151231.0
008			110331s2004 eng
040			_aWSS _dAFV
100			_91511 _aKoziol-McLain, Jane
245			_aHospital responsiveness to family violence : _bbaseline audit findings _cKoziol-McLain, Jane; Adams, Jo; Neitzert, Eva; Davies, Emma; Balzer, Roma; Harvey, Sue; Coben, Jeffrey
260			_aAuckland _bInterdisciplinary Trauma Research Unit, Auckland University of Technology _c2004
300			_a74 p. ; computer file : PDF format (901Kb)
365			_a00 _b0
490	1		_vReport 1
520			_aThis report is the first in a series that evaluates health care responsiveness to family violence. The evaluation project monitors how District Health Boards are responding to Ministry of Health initiatives aimed at increasing the responsiveness of the health system to the needs of women and children at risk from family violence. Three data collection methods are employed during the course of the evaluation. One of these includes hospital audits that have been, and will be, conducted on three occasions: a baseline audit (this report), followed by a 12-month follow-up (Koziol-McLain, et al, 2006), and a 30-month follow-up. These audits will contribute to a nationwide picture of family violence prevention programme development across Aotearoa New Zealand. The second data collection method includes key stakeholder interviews for the purpose of identifying enablers and barriers to institutional change in the area of family violence. The final data collection method will include focus groups. These will be conducted following the 12-month follow-up audit, and will contextualise the audit results. This report presents a nationwide audit of acute care public hospitals and documents a baseline level of system responsiveness to intimate partner violence and child abuse and neglect. Data was collected over the period November 2003 to July 2004 from 25 acute care public hospitals. A standardised audit process examined both system structures and healthcare delivery processes, including hospital policies and procedures, the physical and cultural environments, the training of staff, screening and safety assessment, documentation of family violence, intervention services, evaluation activities, and collaboration, both internally and externally. Baseline audit findings are presented separately for partner abuse and child abuse and neglect. It was found that most hospitals were in the early stages of developing a system response to partner abuse, and in the intermediate stage for responding to children at risk for abuse and neglect. The authors purport that, by working collaboratively with staff from each evaluation site, it is anticipated that the evaluation process will build competence for hospitals to sustain programme auditing and system refinement following completion of this research study. Study limitations and strengths are discussed.
522			_anz
650	2	7	_2FVC _aCHILD NEGLECT _9114
650	2	7	_2FVC _aCHILDREN _9127
650	2	7	_2FVC _aDEMOGRAPHICS _9189
650	2	7	_2FVC _aHEALTH _9283
650	2	7	_2FVC _aINTERVENTION _9326
650	2	7	_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650	2	7	_2FVC _aPOLICY _9447
650	2	4	_aSOCIAL SERVICES _9555
650	2	7	_2FVC _aSTATISTICS _9575
650	2	7	_2FVC _aTREATMENT _9613
650	2	7	_2FVC _aWOMEN _9645
650	2	7	_9357 _aMĀORI _2FVC
650	2	7	_9458 _aPREVENTION _2FVC
650	2	7	_9103 _aCHILD ABUSE _2FVC
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
700	1		_aAdams, Jo _9685
700	1		_aNeitzert, Eva _91792
700	1		_aBalzer, Roma _9745
700	1		_aHarvey, Sue _91307
700	1		_aCoben, Jeffrey H. _9945
700	1		_91025 _aDavies, Emma
856	4		_uhttps://niphmhr.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/8489/report_1_nov_2004.pdf
856	4		_uhttps://niphmhr.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/8488/report_1_summary__nov_2004.pdf _zSummary
856	4		_uhttps://www.aut.ac.nz/phmhri/research-centres/interdisciplinary-trauma-research-centre/family-violence/family-violence-project-evaluation _zAccess the website
942			_2ddc _cREPORT