000 | 02695nam a2200385Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 112861 | ||
005 | 20250625151227.0 | ||
008 | 110331s2005 eng | ||
040 |
_aWSS _dAFV |
||
082 | 0 | _a346.015 JUD | |
100 |
_aThompson, Juliet Louise _92209 |
||
245 |
_aJudicial experiences : _ba discourse analysis of Family Courts judges' talk about domestic violence _cThompson, Juliet Louise |
||
246 | _bA thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Psychology at Massey University. | ||
260 | _c2005 | ||
300 | _avii, 66 p. | ||
365 |
_a00 _b0 |
||
520 | _aThesis (MA - Psychology) - Massey University, 2005. This thesis focuses on Family Court Judges' responses to domestic violence and asks how these Judges make sense of domestic violence and their work within the Domestic Violence Act (1995) in providing effective protection for victims. The framework for the research uses a feminist post-structuralist approach. Two family Court Judges were interviewed and a discursive analysis was made of two published papers, taken from speeches made by Judges. The results of the discursive analysis indicate that within the legal discourse there is a move away from valuing the role of women's groups and feminist theory in regard to the construction of domestic violence. The current construction of domestic violence within the Judges' talk tended to value the role of father's rights groups and the patriarchal familial construction of the father/child relationship. Domestic violence is being constructed more in terms of provocation rather than in terms of power and control, which is the feminist construction of domestic violence that current legislation is base upon. These differences between the legal discourse and feminist discourse constructions of domestic violence raise important questions as to how the aims of the Domestic Violence Act (1995) are being constructed by the Judges and whether these constructions are impacting on the effective protection of domestic violence victims.--AUTHOR'S ABSTRACT | ||
522 | _anz | ||
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aCHILDREN _9127 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aEMOTIONAL ABUSE _9222 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_aFAMILY COURT _9241 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aGENDER _9269 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aJUSTICE _9333 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aLEGISLATION _9346 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aPHYSICAL ABUSE _9439 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aPROTECTION ORDERS _9470 |
650 | 2 | 4 |
_aPSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE _9472 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aSURVIVORS _9593 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aVICTIMS _9622 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aWOMEN _9645 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9431 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _2FVC |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9336 _aLAW |
942 |
_2ddc _cTHESIS |
||
999 |
_c2811 _d2811 |