000 | 02852nam a2200409Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 114570 | ||
005 | 20250625151219.0 | ||
008 | 110331s2007 eng | ||
040 |
_aWSS _dAFV |
||
100 |
_aGregg, Lisa _91257 |
||
245 |
_aCollaboration in family violence intervention : _ba process evaluation of the Hamilton Family Safety Team _cGregg, Lisa |
||
246 | _aA thesis submitted as fulfilment of the requirement of the degree of Master of Social Sciences at the University of Waikato | ||
260 |
_aHamilton, New Zealand _bUniversity of Waikato _c2007 |
||
300 | _a188 pp. ; computer file : PDF format (1.2Mb) | ||
365 |
_a00 _b0 |
||
500 | _aThesis (M.Soc.Sc.)--University of Waikato, 2007 | ||
520 | _aThis thesis evaluated the Hamilton Family Safety Team - a collaborative intervention to address family violence in New Zealand with a particular focus on agencies in the justice system. One of the aims of the evaluation was to assess the extent to which the Team had improved the ability of agencies to enhance the safety and autonomy of battered women and hold offenders accountable. Data was collected through interviews with Team members and others directly involved with the project, observation of Team meetings, a focus group with battered women, and archival research using police family violence files. The evaluation found that the Team has enhanced the autonomy of women in three ways: improving police attitude, improving responses that were already available, and by re-instating court advocate positions. Participants in the evaluation also identified improvements the Family Safety Team had made in the justice system's ability to hold offenders accountable. Based on this and other reported findings, the author concluded that the structure of the Hamilton Family Safety Team supports delivery of an effective systematic response. The research found that overall the people involved were very positive about the Team and describes reasons for this. The thesis notes some limitations of the model related to Team members having dual accountabilities and facing potential isolation from their parent agency. | ||
522 | _anz | ||
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aFAMILIES _9238 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aFAMILY SERVICES _9247 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_aINTERAGENCY COLLABORATION _9396 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aINTERVENTION _9326 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aJUSTICE _9333 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_2FVC _aPHYSICAL ABUSE _9439 |
650 | 2 | 4 |
_aPSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE _9472 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_aSOCIAL WORK PRACTICE _9562 |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_aTHESES _9606 |
651 | 4 |
_aNEW ZEALAND _92588 |
|
651 |
_aHAMILTON _93344 |
||
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9252 _aFAMILY VIOLENCE |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9103 _aCHILD ABUSE _2FVC |
650 | 2 | 7 |
_9121 _aCHILD SEXUAL ABUSE |
856 | 4 | _uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10289/2520 | |
942 |
_2ddc _cTHESIS |
||
999 |
_c2649 _d2649 |