000			03407nam a2200421Ia 4500
999			_c2555 _d2555
001			114697
005			20250625151214.0
008			110331s2008 eng
022			_a1177-4347
040			_aWSS _dAFV
100			_91511 _aKoziol-McLain, Jane
245			_aHospital responsiveness to family violence : _b30 month follow-up evaluation _cKoziol-McLain, Jane; Adams, Jo; Garrett, Nick; Sharma, Pritika
260			_aAuckland, New Zealand _bInterdisciplinary Trauma Research Unit, Auckland University of Technology _c2008
300			_a52 p. ; computer file : PDF format (752 Kb)
365			_a00 _b0
490	1		_aInterdisciplinary Trauma Research Unit ; Report No 7 _vITRU Report No 7
520			_aThis report presents and compares the 30 month follow-up hospital audit findings in a series evaluating national health care responsiveness to family violence. Previous reports in the series were the baseline and 12 month follow-up audit (see Koziol-McLain et al, 2004 and 2006) and these qualitative findings are one aspect the wider evaluation (see Koziol-McLain et al, 2006; Vallant et al, 2007; and Adams et al, 2007). The objective of the audit was to answer two questions: How are New Zealand District Health Boards (DHBs) performing in terms of institutional support of family violence prevention? And is institutional change sustained over time? The modified 'Delphi' tool (Delphi Instrument for Hospital-Based Domestic Violence Programmes) was applied during visits to 27 hospitals within 21 District Health Boards nationwide. This methodology includes two sections: the first concentrates on partner abuse programme elements, while the second focuses on child abuse and neglect programme elements. The authors' findings are that collaboration with community agencies, staff training and intervention services are now present in the majority of hospitals in relation to both partner abuse and child abuse and neglect, and significant progress continues to be made in programme development in response to both. The authors argue that while these are significant improvements, programme implementation is still in the intermediate stages and they express concerns that several hospitals have yet to start developing a system response to family violence and lack Family Violence Intervention Coordinators. The authors argue that further improvement will flow on from dedicated DHB resourcing.
522			_anz
650	2	7	_2FVC _aCHILD NEGLECT _9114
650	2	7	_2FVC _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650	2	7	_2FVC _aHEALTH SERVICES _9290
650	2	7	_2FVC _aHOSPITALS _9299
650	2	7	_2FVC _aINTERVENTION _9326
650	2	7	_2FVC _aINTERVENTION _9326
650	2	7	_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650	2	7	_2FVC _aPROGRAMMES _9467
650	2	7	_2FVC _aTREATMENT _9613
650	2	7	_9458 _aPREVENTION _2FVC
650	2	7	_9103 _aCHILD ABUSE _2FVC
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
700	1		_aAdams, Jo _9685
700	1		_aGarrett, Nick _91203
700	1		_aSharma, Pritika _92094
856	4		_uhttps://niphmhr.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/8485/fve_30_month_report.pdf
856	4		_uhttps://niphmhr.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/8484/fve_30_month_summary.pdf _zSummary
856	4		_uhttps://www.aut.ac.nz/phmhri/research-centres/interdisciplinary-trauma-research-centre/family-violence/family-violence-project-evaluation _zAccess the website
942			_cREPORT _2ddc