000			04031nam a2200445Ia 4500
651	2	4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
999			_c2519 _d2519
001			115464
005			20250625151212.0
008			110331s2009 eng
022			_a1177-4347
040			_aWSS _dAFV
100			_91511 _aKoziol-McLain, Jane
245			_aHospital responsiveness to family violence : _b48 month follow-up evaluation report _cKoziol-McLain, Jane; Garrett, Nick; Gear, Claire
260			_aAuckland, New Zealand _bInterdisciplinary Trauma Research Unit, Auckland University of Technology _c2009
300			_a66 p. ; computer file : PDF format (2.3 Mb)
365			_a00 _b0
490	1		_aInterdisciplinary Trauma Research Unit ; Report No 8 _vITRU Report No 8
500			_aMode of access: World Wide Web. For the full series of evaluation reports go to: http://www.aut.ac.nz/study-at-aut/study-areas/health-sciences/research/interdisciplinary-trauma-research-unit/family-violence/family-violence-project-evaluation#report "This report was commissioned by the Ministry of Health." "We acknowledge Dr Janet Fanslow for her peer review of this report."
505	0	0	_tEXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................iv BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................1 METH
520			_aThis report documents the results of four annual hospital audits (2004-2008), summarising the development of New Zealand District Health Board family violence system responses. Quantitative data from an audit tool was used to measure system indicators during 27 hospital site visits in 21 District Health Boards.The evaluation was focused on two questions: How are New Zealand District Health Boards performing in terms of institutional support for family violence prevention? Secondly, is institutional change sustained over time? The authors found considerable family violence prevention development since the baseline audit in 2004, with the Partner Abuse Intervention Programme score tripled, and the Child Abuse and Neglect Intervention Programme score nearly doubled. Almost half of hospitals had reached the target score (that is, the minimum achievement threshold). Sustainable institutional changes (illustrated by increasing evaluation scores) were considered by the authors to result largely from programme maturation, Family Violence Intervention Co-ordinator stability, ongoing health provider training, and national programme co-ordination. The evaluation results were related by the authors to resources provided by the Ministry of Health and the District Health Boards. In discussing the limitations of the evaluation, the authors observe that it covers only one aspect of an effective healthcare family violence strategy. Community health care responsiveness and research evidence of the effectiveness of interventions are noted as important factors in achieving family violence prevention goals.
522			_anz
650	2	7	_2FVC _aCHILD NEGLECT _9114
650	2	7	_2FVC _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650	2	7	_2FVC _aHEALTH SERVICES _9290
650	2	7	_2FVC _aHOSPITALS _9299
650	2	7	_2FVC _aINTERVENTION _9326
650	2	7	_2FVC _aPROGRAMMES _9467
650	2	7	_2FVC _aTREATMENT _9613
650	2	7	_9431 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _2FVC
650	2	7	_9319 _aINTERAGENCY COLLABORATION _2FVC
650	2	7	_9320 _aINTERAGENCY COLLABORATION _2FVC
650	2	7	_9458 _aPREVENTION _2FVC
650	2	7	_9103 _aCHILD ABUSE _2FVC
700	1		_aGarrett, Nick _91203
700	1		_aGear, Claire _91206
856	4		_uhttps://niphmhr.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/8577/48_month_itru_report_web_file.pdf
856	4		_uhttps://phmhri.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/79279/48-Month-ITRU-Summary.pdf _zSummary
856	4		_uhttps://www.aut.ac.nz/phmhri/research-centres/interdisciplinary-trauma-research-centre/family-violence/family-violence-project-evaluation _zAccess the website
942			_cREPORT _2ddc