000			02323nam a2200253Ia 4500
001			116117
005			20250625151209.0
008			110331s2007 eng
040			_aWSS _dAFV
100			_aPaymar, Michael _91883
245			_aCountering confusion about the Duluth Model _cPaymar, Michael; Barnes, Graham
260			_bDomestic Abuse Intervention Programs _c[2007]
300			_a16 p.
365			_a00 _b0
500			_aDate supplied by publisher
520			_aThis article was written by researchers who have worked with the Domestic Abuse Intervention Project in Duluth, Minnesota in response to criticism of the Duluth model. The authors respond specifically to several research publications and to a number of more general criticisms of the Duluth model. The authors argue that a 2003 National Institute of Justice report ("Batter intervention programs: where do we go from here?") was flawed research that is contradicted by other better designed and more comprehensive studies. The authors also critically review Babcock, Green and Robie's 2002 meta analytic review of domestic violence treatment models, and argue that Dutton and Corvo's 2006 article ("Transforming a flawed policy: a call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice") misrepresents the Duluth curriculum. Seven other more general criticisms of the Duluth model are also addressed in the article: namely that the Duluth curriculum is shame based, doesn't account for women's violence; is not culturally appropriate for marginalised groups and relies too much on the criminal justice system; works counter to restorative justice; that the Domestic Abuse Intervention Project in Duluth is anti-marriage; discounts anger as a causal factor; and ignores psychological problems. The authors follow this with an explanation of theories about why domestic violence happens and how to stop it; what the Duluth model is and is not, and the Duluth approach to working with men who batter.
650	2	7	_2FVC _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650	2	7	_2FVC _aOFFENDERS _9413
650	2	7	_2FVC _aTREATMENT _9613
650	2	7	_9431 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _2FVC
700	1		_aBarnes, Graham _9749
856	4		_uhttp://www.bwjp.org/files/bwjp/files/Countering_Confusion_Duluth_Model.pdf
942			_2ddc _cBRIEFING
999			_c2455 _d2455