000			01251nab a2200289Ia 4500
001			112790
005			20250625151203.0
008			110331s1991 eng
022			_a0028-8373
040			_aWSS _dAFV
100			_aStewart, Gordon _92154
245			_aDomestic protection : _brecent decisions regarding non-molestation orders _cStewart, Gordon
260			_aWellington _bButterworths _c1991
365			_a00 _b0
500			_aNew Zealand Law Journal February 1991 : 37-38
520			_aThis article discusses three recent unreported decisions in relation to non-molestation orders. The author suggests that the content of the decisions may be of interest to practitioners and academics. One of the cases involves the issue of error in an affidavit, and the other two cases centre around the issue of legislative interpretation.
650	2	7	_2FVC _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650	2	7	_2FVC _aJUSTICE _9333
650	2	7	_2FVC _aLEGISLATION _9346
650	2	7	_2FVC _aPROTECTION ORDERS _9470
650	2	7	_2FVC _aWOMEN _9645
650	2	7	_9431 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _2FVC
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
773	0		_tNew Zealand Law Journal February 1991 : 37-38
830			_aNew Zealand Law Journal _94723
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE
999			_c2348 _d2348