000			01623nab a2200313Ia 4500
001			113017
005			20250625151203.0
008			110331s1994 eng
022			_a1350-2778
040			_aWSS _dAFV
100			_aStewart, Gordon _92154
245			_aA response to Neville Robertson _cStewart, Gordon
260			_aWellington _bButterworths _c1994
365			_a00 _b0
490	0		_aButterworths Family Law Journal
500			_aButterworths Family Law Journal 1(7) December 1994 : 150
520			_aThis commentary responds to Neville Robertson's criticism of the author in relation to changes proposed in the Davison Report. The author suggests that he and Robertson have a difference of opinion regarding the Davison Report which, in his view, is made clear by their respective articles. The author expresses concern regarding a perceived personal attack by Robertson. This centres on Robertson's comment about the author having a tendency to minimise, trivialise and make invisible violence against women and children within the family. Stewart contends that the article he wrote was from an objective perspective and accuses Robertson of reading too much into his choice of words.
522			_anz
650	2	7	_2FVC _aCHILDREN _9127
650	2	7	_2FVC _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650	2	7	_2FVC _aFAMILIES _9238
650	2	7	_2FVC _aJUSTICE _9333
650	2	7	_2FVC _aLEGISLATION _9346
650	2	7	_2FVC _aWOMEN _9645
650	2	7	_9431 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _2FVC
651	2	4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
773	0		_tButterworths Family Law Journal 1(7) December 1994 : 150
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE
999			_c2339 _d2339