000			01699nab a2200349Ia 4500
001			20146
005			20250625151202.0
008			110331s1995 eng
022			_a1350-2778
040			_aWSS _dAFV
082	0		_aH/C
100			_aBusch, Ruth _9856
245			_aThe 1995 Domestic Violence Bill: _ba reform half done? _cBusch, Ruth; Robertson, Neville R.
260			_aWellington _bButterworths _c1995
365			_a00 _b0
500			_aButterworths Family Law Journal 1(10) June 1995 : 216-221
520			_aThis article evaluates the Domestic Violence Bill, questioning its effectiveness in terms of enhancing women's safety and autonomy. It asks to what extent the Bill mandates this importance, rather than leaving it to the discretion of decision-makers as has been the case in the past. A critical analysis of the scope of the Bill is given and recommendations for changes to major aspects of it are made. These aspects include: protection orders and penalties for breaching them, orders relating to property, consent orders, liaison with police, and restrictions on publication of reports of proceedings.
522			_anz
650	2	7	_2FVC _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650	2	7	_2FVC _aINTERVENTION _9326
650	2	7	_2FVC _aLEGISLATION _9346
650	2	7	_2FVC _aPOLICY _9447
650	2	7	_2FVC _aPROTECTION ORDERS _9470
650	2	7	_2FVC _aSTATUTES _9578
650	2	7	_9431 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _2FVC
650	2	7	_9458 _aPREVENTION _2FVC
651	2	4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
773	0		_tButterworths Family Law Journal 1(10) June 1995 : 216-221
700	1		_92013 _aRobertson, Neville R.
830			_95165 _aButterworths Family Law Journal
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE
999			_c2320 _d2320