000			02119nab a2200253Ia 4500
001			112432
005			20250625151157.0
008			110331s2000 eng
040			_aWSS _dAFV
100			_aHenaghan, Mark _91333
245			_aRelocation cases _cpresenters Mark Henaghan, Bronwen Klipel, Dugald Matheson _bNew Zealand Law Society seminar
260			_aWellington, N.Z. _bButterworths _c2000
365			_a00 _b0
505	0	0	_tPART 1: RELOCATION CASES - THE LAW 1 Introduction 1 1. Technical issues 2 Jurisdiction 2 Burden of Proof 3 2. The New Zealand Court of Appeal and overseas jurisdictions 3 Stadniczenko v Stadniczenko [1995] NZFLR 493 3 Australia 5 Canada 8
520			_aThis conference paper focuses on relocation cases in the New Zealand Family Court. The cases involve one guardian seeking permission to relocate with their children to another town, city or country, or one guardian seeking to stop another relocating with the children. Using court data and drawing on practice experience, the author outlines recent developments in court outcomes and legislation. The author maintains that from 1988 to 2000 there was an increase in relocations being disallowed by the court and the number of relocations that were blocked went from 38% to 52%. The author discusses the significant factors in cases where relocation was allowed, and where applications to prevent relocation were successful. The report then compares the New Zealand situation with practice in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The impact of the proposed Care of Children Act (2004) on relocation cases is also outlined. The author maintains that some sections of this Act conflict, and that the Act may have some significant effects on relocation decisions.
522			_anz
650	2	7	_2FVC _aJUSTICE _9333
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
500			_aNew Zealand Law Society Family Law Conference 2000 : 189-205
650	2	7	_9336 _aLAW _2FVC
650	2	4	_aCONTACT (ACCESS) _929
773	0		_tNew Zealand Law Society Family Law Conference 2000 : 189-205
942			_2ddc _cBRIEFING
999			_c2212 _d2212