000 02962nab a2200385Ia 4500
001 112637
005 20250625151155.0
008 110331s2002 eng
022 _a0110-022X
040 _aWSS
_dAFV
100 _aJacobs, Phil
_91422
245 _aLessons to be learned from the Health and Disability Commissioner's findings :
_bsexual abuse
_cJacobs, Phil; Webber, Cathy
260 _aWellington
_bThe Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
_c2002
300 _a1 p. ; computer file : PDF format (58Kb)
365 _a00
_b0
500 _aNew Zealand Family Physician 29(5) October 2002 : 344
520 _aThis article discusses the educational opportunities presented by the Health and Disability Commissioner's findings in relation to the case of a 7-year-old girl who was sexually abused by a family member, and the resulting lack of compliance on the part of her family general practitioner (GP) with the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights by not complying with certain professional standards and exposing her to further risk of abuse. A brief examination of the Health and Disability Commissioner's findings and further discussion is provided in the article, as well as key points to be learned from the case. These include: keeping an open mind to the possibility of child abuse; taking and documenting an accurate patient history; looking for signs of abuse and neglect; and referrals to appropriate specialist individuals or agencies for a proper forensic examination. The article also points out that any case of a sexually transmitted disease (STD) in a child must alert the GP to the possibility of sexual abuse, and that referral to the appropriate authorities (Child Youth and Family (CYF) and/or Police) is essential, even if against parental wishes. It makes it clear that investigation and interview of the child is the responsibility of CYF and the Police, that forensic examination should be carried out following CYF referral to Doctors for Sexual Abuse Care (DSAC), that prior treatment of an STD negates this, and that there are no legal barriers to GPs for referral to CYF where it is deemed they have acted in good faith, as the care of the child takes precedence over the care of the family.
522 _anz
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aCHILDREN
_9127
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aINTERVENTION
_9326
650 5 _aMEDICAL CARE
_9368
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aNEGLECT
_9401
650 2 4 _aSOCIAL SERVICES
_9555
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aTREATMENT
_9613
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aVICTIMS
_9622
651 4 _aNEW ZEALAND
_92588
650 2 7 _9458
_aPREVENTION
_2FVC
650 2 7 _9336
_aLAW
650 2 7 _9103
_aCHILD ABUSE
_2FVC
650 2 7 _9121
_aCHILD SEXUAL ABUSE
700 1 _aWebber, Cathy
_92297
773 0 _tNew Zealand Family Physician 29(5) October 2002 : 344
856 4 _uhttp://www.rnzcgp.org.nz/assets/documents/Publications/Archive-NZFP/Oct-2002-NZFP-Vol-29-No-5/HDC-October-02.pdf
942 _2ddc
_cM
999 _c2168
_d2168