000 02424nab a2200289Ia 4500
001 112433
005 20250625151152.0
008 110331s2004 eng
040 _aWSS
_dAFV
100 _aJeffries, Samantha
_91431
245 _a''Newsmaking criminology" or "infotainment" criminology? :
_ba decontextualised, fragmented and misconstrued critique
_cJeffries, Samantha
260 _aBowen Hills, Qld.
_bAustralian Academic Press
_c2004
300 _a0.91666666667
365 _a00
_b0
490 0 _aAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology
500 _aAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 2004, 37(2): 286-295
520 _aThis article is a response to Judith Buckingham's critique of the author's PhD thesis methodology and research findings, and the work of Jeffries' thesis co-supervisor, Associate Professor of Sociology, Greg Newbold, that was presented in Buckingham's article "'Newsmaking criminology' or 'infotainment' criminology?'" As such, this response contributes to the debate on gender asymmetry of domestic violence. Jeffries supports her findings through a discussion of her research. The objectives of the research were to identify if there are any gender differences in sentencing and remand outcomes; if there are any gendered criteria in sentencing and remand; and how differences may occur if they do exist. Three hundred and eighty-eight male and female sentenced offenders, between 1990 and 1997, were sampled and matched for criteria, including major statutory offence and number of charges. Results show that some gender differences exist; men are more likely to be remanded in custody and for longer periods than females. Findings also show that the criteria employed for reaching judicial outcomes appears to differ for men and women and outcomes for women are less harsh. The author also discusses the social construction of femininity and masculinity, how this impacts on perceptions of men and women as offenders, and subsequently, on judicial outcomes.
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9203
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aGENDER
_9269
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aJUSTICE
_9333
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aOFFENDERS
_9413
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aVICTIMS
_9622
650 2 7 _9431
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
_2FVC
773 0 _tAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 2004, 37(2): 286-295
856 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1375/acri.37.2.286
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE
999 _c2106
_d2106