000 02201nab a2200253Ia 4500
001 116539
005 20250625151140.0
008 110331s2009 eng
040 _aWSS
_dAFV
100 _aVess, James
_92250
245 _aRisk assessment of sexual offenders for extended supervision orders in New Zealand :
_bbasic principles and current practice
_cVess, James
260 _c2009
365 _a00
_b0
500 _aSubscriber access: http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=4CB2B43E7F9084127C77
520 _aThis article describes the principles and current practice of risk assessment of sexual offenders for extended supervision orders in New Zealand. Drawing on recent experience with expert evidence and judicial decision making in extended supervision cases, the author suggests that those involved in the process might benefit from a deeper understanding of the current state of sexual offender risk assessment provided by mental health experts. The author states that well-validated actuarial measures are available that can help distinguish between lower and higher risk offenders; static measures are now being augmented with dynamic risk factors. However, these tools must be properly administered, scored and integrated with other information. Due to the weight placed on risk assessment information in court, failure to follow standardised procedures may be worse than not using such measures. All factors contributing to a risk assessment must be explicitly stated. Terms should be used consistently, and risk categories should be qualified by probability statements giving re-offence rates for groups of similar offenders. Risk assessments should state the known contingences that will influence the degree of risk. The assessment should also specify the likely victims and severity of harm.
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aJUSTICE
_9333
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aOFFENDERS
_9413
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aSEXUAL ABUSE
_914001
650 2 7 _2FVC
_aSOCIAL WORK PRACTICE
_9562
500 _aJournal of Child Sexual Abuse 18(2) March 2009 : 174-189
650 2 4 _aSEXUAL VIOLENCE
_9531
651 2 4 _aNEW ZEALAND
_92588
773 0 _tJournal of Child Sexual Abuse 18(2) March 2009 : 174-189
999 _c1848
_d1848