000			03010nab a2200277Ia 4500
651	2	4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
999			_c1843 _d1843
001			116379
005			20250625151139.0
008			110331s2009 eng
040			_aWSS _dAFV
100			_aHyslop, Ian _91407
245			_aChild protection policy and practice : _ba relationship lost in translation _cHyslop, Ian
260			_c2009
365			_a00 _b0
500			_aSocial Policy Journal of New Zealand, 2009,34:62-72
520			_aThis article considers the challenges and opportunities facing contemporary child protection practice and contends that a meaningful understanding of child protection can best be gleaned by examining how practice is connected historically and sociologically with the broader discipline of social work. The essence of social work is described as a contradictory mix of surveillance and empowerment. The Victorian genesis of social work is linked to a distinction between the deserving and undeserving, yet also with a theme of redemption and liberation. It is suggested that the positioning of social workers as intermediaries between the comfortable and the threatening classes remains a salient feature in current practice. The relevance of the enduring phenomenon of a constructed underclass for child protection practice is explored. It is contended that anxiety associated with the breakdown of modernist certainties in the last 40 or 50 years has created an impetus to define and measure child protection in a mechanistic and risk-averse manner, and that the dominant instrumental form of social science misapprehends the nature of child protection as "practice". A paradigm conflict is described, whereby managerial policy frameworks fundamentally fail to accommodate the essence of social work. It is argued that the effective development of child protection practice requires that it be re-conceptualised as complex, creative and interactive as opposed to a two-dimensional process of procedural compliance. It is suggested that child protection practice must be reacquainted with the voice of practice wisdom -- contextualised in the same way that social work is itself a process of engagement with social context. Practitioners, educators and theorists are challenged to actively advocate for an accurate understanding of child protection as ambiguous and situated social practice.
650	2	7	_2FVC _aCHILD PROTECTION _9118
650	2	7	_2FVC _aCHILDREN _9127
650	2	7	_2FVC _aPOLICY _9447
650	2	7	_2FVC _aSOCIAL WORK PRACTICE _9562
773	0		_tSocial Policy Journal of New Zealand, 2009,34:62-72
830			_aSocial Policy Journla of New Zealand _97061
856	4		_uhttp://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/journals-and-magazines/social-policy-journal/spj34/child-protection.pdf
856	4		_uhttp://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/journals-and-magazines/social-policy-journal/spj34/34-child-protection.html
942			_cARTICLE _2ddc