TY  - SER
AU  - Hall, Seventy F.
AU  - Sage, Melanie
AU  - Scott, Carol F. 
AU  - Joseph, Kenneth
TI  - A systematic review of sophisticated predictive and prescriptive analytics in child welfare: accuracy, equity and bias
PY  - 2023///
PB  - Springer, 
KW  - CHILD ABUSE
KW  - CHILD PROTECTION
KW  - CHILD WELFARE
KW  - DATA ANALYSIS
KW  - ETHICS
KW  - PREDICTIVE RISK MODELLING
KW  - SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE
KW  - SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
KW  - INTERNATIONAL
KW  - UNITED STATES
KW  - THE NETHERLANDS
KW  - NEW ZEALAND
N1  - Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2023, First published online, 23 May 2023
N2  - Child welfare agencies increasingly use machine learning models to predict outcomes and inform decisions. These tools are intended to increase accuracy and fairness but can also amplify bias. This systematic review explores how researchers addressed ethics, equity, bias, and model performance in their design and evaluation of predictive and prescriptive algorithms in child welfare. We searched EBSCO databases, Google Scholar, and reference lists for journal articles, conference papers, dissertations, and book chapters published between January 2010 and March 2020. Sources must have reported on the use of algorithms to predict child welfare-related outcomes and either suggested prescriptive responses, or applied their models to decision-making contexts. We calculated descriptive statistics and conducted Mann-Whitney U tests, and Spearman’s rank correlations to summarize and synthesize findings. Of 15 articles, fewer than half considered ethics, equity, or bias or engaged participatory design principles as part of model development/evaluation. Only one-third involved cross-disciplinary teams. Model performance was positively associated with number of algorithms tested and sample size. No other statistical tests were significant. Interest in algorithmic decision-making in child welfare is growing, yet there remains no gold standard for ameliorating bias, inequity, and other ethics concerns. Our review demonstrates that these efforts are not being reported consistently in the literature and that a uniform reporting protocol may be needed to guide research. In the meantime, computer scientists might collaborate with content experts and stakeholders to ensure they account for the practical implications of using algorithms in child welfare settings. (Authors' abstract). New Zealand projects are included in this review. Record #8199
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-023-00931-2
ER  -