TY - BOOK AU - Herbert, James L. AU - Bromfield, Leah TI - National comparison of cross-agency practice in investigating and responding to severe child abuse: a report to the NSW Ombudsman's Office (Report 1 of 2) PY - 2017/// CY - Adelaide, SA : PB - Australian Centre for Child Protection, University of South Australia, KW - CHILD ABUSE KW - CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE KW - CHILD PROTECTION KW - INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION KW - INTERVENTION KW - JUSTICE KW - POLICE KW - POLICE PROCEDURES KW - AUSTRALIA KW - CANADA KW - DENMARK KW - FINLAND KW - GREENLAND KW - ICELAND KW - NEW ZEALAND KW - SCOTLAND KW - SWEDEN KW - UNITED KINGDOM KW - UNITED STATES N2 - This report summarises a comparison of Australian and select international jurisdictions against the approach of the Joint Investigation Response Team (JIRT) model in New South Wales. The structure of this report includes a brief rationale for the characteristics compared, a narrative summary of cross-agency responses in Australia, a narrative summary of selected cross-agency responses in equivalent international jurisdictions, and a detailed comparison of responses in Australian jurisdictions. This report reviewed a variety of international MDT models to better understand cross-agency practices in comparable jurisdictions. The included jurisdictions were judged to be comparable liberal democracies with similar social and economic conditions. The review included a brief narrative discussion of prominent international collaborative models. These include Child Advocacy Centres in the United States and Canada, Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs (United Kingdom), Joint Child Abuse Investigation Teams (Scotland), Barnahus (Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Greenland, & Iceland), and Puawaitahi (New Zealand). These are briefly compared to the JIRT model. (From the Executive summary). Record #5653 UR - http://www.unisa.edu.au/Global/EASS/Research/ACCP/National%20Comparison%20of%20Cross-Agency%20Practice%20in%20Investigating%20and%20Responding%20to%20Severe%20Child%20Abuse%20.pdf ER -