Image from Google Jackets

Interventions to prevent intimate partner violence : Ema Alsina, Joyce L. Browne, Desi Gielkens, Maaike A. J. Noorman and John B. F. De Wit a systematic review and meta-analysis

By: Contributor(s): Material type: ArticleArticleSeries: Violence Against WomenPublication details: Sage, 2023Subject(s): Online resources: In: Violence Against Women, 2023, 30(3-4): 953-980Summary: Intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a global health and human rights problem. This systematic review assesses the effects of preventive interventions on the occurrence of IPV experience or perpetration. Twenty-six studies published between January 1, 2008 and March 31, 2022 were included, contributing 91 effect sizes. Multilevel meta-analysis showed a protective pooled effect (risk ratio = 0.85, 95% CI [0.77, 0.99]). Interventions (also) including men were more effective than interventions for women only. No other moderators were found. Findings underscore that various IPV prevention interventions are now available that can improve the health and rights of women in diverse settings. (Authors' abstract). Record #8540
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Barcode
Access online Access online Vine library Online Available ON24020011

Violence Against Women, 2023, 30(3-4): 953-980

Intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a global health and human rights problem. This systematic review assesses the effects of preventive interventions on the occurrence of IPV experience or perpetration. Twenty-six studies published between January 1, 2008 and March 31, 2022 were included, contributing 91 effect sizes. Multilevel meta-analysis showed a protective pooled effect (risk ratio = 0.85, 95% CI [0.77, 0.99]). Interventions (also) including men were more effective than interventions for women only. No other moderators were found. Findings underscore that various IPV prevention interventions are now available that can improve the health and rights of women in diverse settings. (Authors' abstract). Record #8540