The 'any evidence' rule in New Zealand family law (Record no. 8117)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 01907nab a22002657a 4500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250625151635.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 230419s2020 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
Original cataloging agency | AFVC |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | High, Anna |
9 (RLIN) | 10386 |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | The 'any evidence' rule in New Zealand family law |
Statement of responsibility, etc | Anna High and Caroline Hickman |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc | New Zealand Law Foundation, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2020 |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | New Zealand Law Review, 2020, 29(1) 49-74 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc | The ‘any evidence’ rule provides judicial discretion to admit evidence in the Family Court that would otherwise be inadmissible. Although the rule has frequently been criticised, its operation and ongoing value have not been closely examined. In its recently-reformed iteration, the ‘any evidence’ rule embodies and demands a rigorous approach to evidentiary issues in the Family Court, premised on fundamental Evidence Act principles of relevance, probative value and prejudicial effect. In this first comprehensive review of the New Zealand family law ‘any evidence’ rule, based on an analysis of post-reform case law, we argue that the rule should be repealed. It is unnecessary, other than in relation to the special issue of children’s hearsay, and in practice contributes to a lax approach to the admission of evidence in the Family Court. We conclude by setting out recommendations for reformed law and practice, and directing users towards a more principled approach to family law evidence in the meantime. (Authors' abstract). Record #8117 |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | FAMILY COURT |
9 (RLIN) | 241 |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | FAMILY LAW |
9 (RLIN) | 244 |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | CHILDREN |
9 (RLIN) | 127 |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | EVIDENCE |
9 (RLIN) | 237 |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LAW REFORM |
9 (RLIN) | 338 |
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
Geographic name | NEW ZEALAND |
9 (RLIN) | 2588 |
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Hickman, Caroline |
9 (RLIN) | 8458 |
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
Title | New Zealand Law Review, 2020, 29(1) 49-74 |
830 ## - SERIES ADDED ENTRY--UNIFORM TITLE | |
Uniform title | New Zealand Law Review |
9 (RLIN) | 5171 |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/10523/12221">http://hdl.handle.net/10523/12221</a> |
Public note | Read online |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
Koha item type | Journal article |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dewey Decimal Classification | Vine library | Vine library | 19/04/2023 | Online | ON23040035 | 19/04/2023 | 19/04/2023 | Access online |