Communicating absence of consent is not enough : (Record no. 7904)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02257nab a22003017a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151626.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 221108s2020 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency AFVC
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name McDonald, Elisabeth
9 (RLIN) 1672
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Communicating absence of consent is not enough :
Remainder of title the results of an examination of contemporary rape trials
Statement of responsibility, etc Elisabeth McDonald
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Taylor & Francis,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2020
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Australian Feminist Law Journal, 2020, 46(2): 205-224
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc In a study of 40 adult rape jury trials, aimed at identifying how and why the questioning process in rape trials results in re-traumatisation, researchers noticed how often adult women complainants gave evidence of clearly expressed lack of consent – through words or conduct or a combination of both. In 26 cases the complainant also gave evidence of multiple attempts to negotiate the desired limits of sexual intimacy. Her evidence was challenged in cross-examination and during closing arguments by emphasis on aspects of her conduct argued to be indicative of consent. Clearly articulated absence of consent was not a predictor of convictions, even in the Aotearoa New Zealand Sexual Violence Court Pilot. Only 13 of these 26 cases resulted in a guilty verdict. In this article, I will examine how the narratives about consent in recent adult rape trials illustrate the ongoing significance of feminist critiques of the concept, particularly its efficacy regarding gendered sexual violence, as well as counselling caution about expectations of a reformed definition of consent. (Author's abstract). See also the book on this topic by the author (#6557). Record #7904
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CONSENT
9 (RLIN) 4690
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element COURTS
9 (RLIN) 162
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CRIMINAL JUSTICE
9 (RLIN) 167
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element EVIDENCE
9 (RLIN) 237
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element LAW REFORM
9 (RLIN) 338
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element LEGAL PROFESSION
9 (RLIN) 8151
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element RAPE
9 (RLIN) 488
650 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SEXUAL VIOLENCE
9 (RLIN) 531
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element WOMEN
9 (RLIN) 645
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name NEW ZEALAND
9 (RLIN) 2588
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Australian Feminist Law Journal, 2020, 46(2): 205-224
830 ## - SERIES ADDED ENTRY--UNIFORM TITLE
Uniform title Australian Feminist Law Journal
9 (RLIN) 11440
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://doi.orrg/10.1080/13200968.2021.1930432">https://doi.orrg/10.1080/13200968.2021.1930432</a>
Public note DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2021.1930432
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Journal article
Classification part news115

No items available.