Grandparent contact : (Record no. 6796)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02216nab a22002897a 4500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250625151534.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 200820s2020 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
| Original cataloging agency | AFVC |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Kaganas, Felicity |
| 9 (RLIN) | 9340 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Grandparent contact : |
| Remainder of title | another presumption? |
| Statement of responsibility, etc | Felicity Kaganas and Christine Piper |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc | Taylor & Francis, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2020 |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | Journal of Social Work and Family Law, 2020, 42(2): 176-203 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | This article reviews the debate about the enhancement of grandparents’ legal status in relation to their grandchildren. In particular, it observes that calls for a legal presumption in favour of grandparent contact with their grandchildren when family relationships break down were emboldened by the enactment in s1(2A) of the Children Act 1989 of a presumption that involvement of both parents in their children’s lives furthers children’s welfare. Proponents of grandparent rights argued that there should be a similar statutory presumption in favour of grandparent involvement. It is also argued that courts should strictly enforce child arrangement orders that give grandparents time with grandchildren. The article examines the welfare case for such involvement and concludes that there is no unequivocal evidence to support it. It also considers the effect of the presumption in s1(2A). The article concludes that to enact a similar presumption in favour of grandparents, to apply a de facto presumption, to enforce orders strictly and even to remove the leave requirement that currently exists, could prejudice the interests of mothers as well as children. (Authors' abstract). Record #6796 |
| 650 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | CONTACT (ACCESS) |
| 9 (RLIN) | 29 |
| 650 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | CONTACT (ACCESS) |
| 9 (RLIN) | 29 |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | FAMILY LAW |
| 9 (RLIN) | 244 |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | GRANDPARENTS |
| 9 (RLIN) | 276 |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MOTHERS |
| 9 (RLIN) | 392 |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PARENTAL RIGHTS |
| 9 (RLIN) | 427 |
| 651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | INTERNATIONAL |
| 9 (RLIN) | 3624 |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | UNITED KINGDOM |
| 9 (RLIN) | 2604 |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Piper, Christine |
| 9 (RLIN) | 9341 |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Title | Journal of Social Work and Family Law, 2020, 42(2): 176-203 |
| 830 ## - SERIES ADDED ENTRY--UNIFORM TITLE | |
| Uniform title | Journal of Social Work and Family Law |
| 9 (RLIN) | 9342 |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2020.1751932">https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2020.1751932</a> |
| Public note | DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2020.1751932 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type | Journal article |
No items available.