Parenting arrangements after separation study: Evaluating the 2014 family law reforms : (Record no. 6777)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03724nam a22003017a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151533.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 190715s2019 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency AFVC
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Taylor, Nicola J.
9 (RLIN) 2195
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Parenting arrangements after separation study: Evaluating the 2014 family law reforms :
Remainder of title Family justice professionals' perspectives. Research report for the New Zealand Law Foundation.
Statement of responsibility, etc Nicola Taylor, Megan Gollop and Nicola Liebergreen
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Dunedin, New Zealand :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Children's Issues Centre, University of Otago,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2019
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent electronic document (443 pages) ; PDF file
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Published September 2019
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc The reforms introduced on 31 March 2014 were intended to shift the emphasis in New Zealand’s family justice system away from in-Court to out-of-Court processes. In 2014 the<br/>New Zealand Law Foundation generously funded an independent two-phase research<br/>project to evaluate these reforms. Phase One (2014-2015) involved the initial scoping, consultation and planning for implementation of the Phase Two nationwide mixed methods<br/>study undertaken during 2016-2019.<br/><br/>In Phase Two, an online survey for professionals who had worked in the family justice<br/>system since the reforms took effect was open for two months from May to July 2018 on the<br/>study website. This ascertained their experiences of, and satisfaction with, the reforms four years following their implementation and with the current family justice system. The survey was completed by 364 family justice professionals including lawyers, psychologists, counsellors, Parenting Through Separation (PTS) providers, Family Dispute Resolution (FDR)<br/>providers, Community Law Centre and Family Court personnel. Many had more than one role. Lawyers (including those providing advice and representing parties, Lawyers for the<br/>Child and FLAS providers) comprised the largest group of survey respondents. Just over a fifth (21%) were FDR mediators, 12% were counsellors, 10% were mediators in private practice, and 9% were Parenting Through Separation providers/facilitators. The majority of<br/>the family justice professionals were female (76%). Most (95%) had a tertiary qualification. They worked across all regions of New Zealand and many worked across multiple regions.<br/>The largest proportion (26%) worked in the Auckland region, followed by Canterbury (16%) and Wellington (15%).<br/>One hundred (27%) of these 364 family justice professionals also participated in a telephone interview with a member of the research team. [1] The majority were legal practitioners.<br/>However, the proportion of mediators was higher in the interview sample than in the survey sample. Otherwise, the interview sub-sample of family justice professionals was generally representative of the survey sample. (From the Executive summary). Parents' and caregivers' perspectives are reported in subsequent reports Part 1 (#6775 & Part 2 (#6776) completed in 2020. A research summary is also available. Record #6777<br/>
650 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CONTACT (ACCESS)
9 (RLIN) 29
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element FAMILY COURT
9 (RLIN) 241
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element FAMILY LAW
9 (RLIN) 244
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element JUSTICE
9 (RLIN) 333
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element LAW REFORM
9 (RLIN) 338
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SEPARATION
9 (RLIN) 522
650 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CONTACT (ACCESS)
9 (RLIN) 29
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name NEW ZEALAND
9 (RLIN) 2588
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Gollop, Megan
9 (RLIN) 1240
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Liebergreen, Nicola
9 (RLIN) 9308
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.lawfoundation.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/4.-PASS_Perspectives_of_Family_Justice_Professionals_FULL_Report_FINAL_18.6.2020.pdf">https://www.lawfoundation.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/4.-PASS_Perspectives_of_Family_Justice_Professionals_FULL_Report_FINAL_18.6.2020.pdf</a>
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.lawfoundation.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/5.-PASS_Perspectives_of_Family_Justice_Professionals_-_Research_SUMMARY_FINAL_18.6.2020.pdf">https://www.lawfoundation.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/5.-PASS_Perspectives_of_Family_Justice_Professionals_-_Research_SUMMARY_FINAL_18.6.2020.pdf</a>
Public note Research summary
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Report
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Vine library Vine library 11/08/2020   Online ON20080014 11/08/2020 11/08/2020 Access online