Why call someone by what we don't want them to be? (Record no. 6385)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02240nab a22002417a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151515.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 190918s2018 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency AFVC
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
9 (RLIN) 2335
Personal name Willis, Gwenda M.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Why call someone by what we don't want them to be?
Remainder of title The ethics of labeling in forensic/correctional psychology
Statement of responsibility, etc Gwenda M. Willis
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Taylor & Francis,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2018
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Psychology, Crime & Law, 2018, 24(7): 727-743
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Labeling a person by their past behavior or a criminal conviction is commonplace throughout forensic and correctional psychology. Labels including ‘offender’ and ‘sex offender’ infiltrate academic writing and conference presentations, names of professional organizations and treatment programmes and, at times, traverse therapeutic work. That such labels are frequently used and rarely advocated against suggests that helping professionals either (i) don't recognize labeling as an ethical issue, or (ii) don't consider it their role to challenge. The current paper aims to encourage critical reflection on the use of labels in forensic and correctional psychology. Key concerns are illustrated through a focus on labels commonly assigned to individuals who have sexually abused, where labeling is especially prolific. The scope of labeling is reviewed, and implications for rehabilitation and reintegration discussed. Next, an analysis of the ethics of labeling individuals on the basis of criminal convictions, past behavior or psychological phenomena is presented. It is argued that the use of such labels contradict core ethical principles including beneficence and nonmaleficence, respect for the dignity of all persons, and responsibilities to society. A de-labelling movement for forensic/correctional psychology and related fields is proposed. (Author's abstract). Record #6385
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 4269
Topical term or geographic name as entry element DESISTANCE
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element ETHICS
9 (RLIN) 5807
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element REHABILITATION
9 (RLIN) 493
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SEX OFFENDERS
9 (RLIN) 528
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name NEW ZEALAND
9 (RLIN) 2588
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Psychology, Crime & Law, 2018, 24(7): 727-743
830 ## - SERIES ADDED ENTRY--UNIFORM TITLE
Uniform title Psychology, Crime & Law
9 (RLIN) 8609
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1421640">https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1421640</a>
Public note Read abstract
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Journal article

No items available.