Are intensive parental alienation treatments effective and safe for children and adolescents? (Record no. 6326)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02346nab a22002897a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151512.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 190722s2019 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency AFVC
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Mercer, Jean
9 (RLIN) 8514
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Are intensive parental alienation treatments effective and safe for children and adolescents?
Statement of responsibility, etc Jean Mercer
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Taylor & Francis,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2019
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Journal of Child Custody, 2019, 16(1): 67-113
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Strong claims have been made for the possibility of diagnostic discrimination between children who refuse contact with a nonpreferred divorced parent due to parental alienation (PA) created by the preferred parent and those who refuse for other reasons such as abuse. PA proponents have also argued that interventions, which include custody changes, can alter the alienated children’s attitudes and create positive behavior toward the nonpreferred parent. This article examines the plausibility of PA diagnostic and treatment claims and relevant empirical evidence. It is concluded that PA advocates have failed to provide empirical support for the safety and effectiveness of their methods and that custody proceedings should take these facts into consideration. Future research directions based on established understanding of child development are suggested. (Author's abstract).<br/><br/>See related articles published in Volume 16(1): Special Issue Part I: Misperceptions and Misapplications of Research in Family Law Cases: Myths of “Parental Alienation Syndrome” and Implanted False Memories, and Volume 16(2): Special Issue Part II: Misperceptions and Misapplications of Research in Family Law Cases. (Guest Editor for both issues: Morgan Shaw). Record #6326
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element ATTACHMENT
9 (RLIN) 69
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element FAMILY COURT
9 (RLIN) 241
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element FAMILY LAW
9 (RLIN) 244
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element INTERVENTION
9 (RLIN) 326
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element JUSTICE
9 (RLIN) 333
650 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CONTACT (ACCESS)
9 (RLIN) 29
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name UNITED STATES
9 (RLIN) 2646
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Journal of Child Custody, 2019, 16(1): 67-113
830 ## - SERIES ADDED ENTRY--UNIFORM TITLE
Uniform title Journal of Child Custody
9 (RLIN) 4729
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2018.1557578">https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2018.1557578</a>
Public note Read abstract
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wjcc20/16/1?nav=tocList">https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wjcc20/16/1?nav=tocList</a>
Public note Special issue: Part I
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wjcc20/16/2?nav=tocList">https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wjcc20/16/2?nav=tocList</a>
Public note Special issue: Part II
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Journal article

No items available.