Self-report measures that do not produce gender parity in intimate partner violence: (Record no. 6251)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02966nab a22002537a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151509.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 190514s2016 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency AFVC
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
9 (RLIN) 3264
Personal name Hamby, Sherry L.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Self-report measures that do not produce gender parity in intimate partner violence:
Remainder of title A multi-study investigation
Statement of responsibility, etc Sherry Hamby
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc American Psychological Association,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2016
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Psychology of Violence, 2016, 6(2), 323-335.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Objective: Gender patterns in intimate partner violence (IPV) remain a controversial topic. Some self-report measures produce gender “parity” in IPV rates. However, other self-report surveys do not produce gender parity, nor do arrests, reports to law enforcement, homicide data, helpseeking data, or witness reports. This methodological inconsistency is still poorly understood. The objective of these studies is to explore the effects of item wording on gender patterns for victimization reports in a range of samples. Method: In Study 1, 238 undergraduates were randomly assigned either the standard Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) physical victimization items or a version which changed the partner-specific wording to generic wording (“Someone” instead of “My partner”), with perpetrator information collected in follow-up. Studies 2 and 3 compared the standard approach to items with stems intended to reduce false positives (either “Not including horseplay or joking around . . .” or “When my partner was angry . . .”), among 251 college students and 98 agency-involved women, respectively. Study 4 implemented the “not joking” alternative from Study 3 in a large rural community sample (n = 1,207). Results: In Studies 1 and 2, significant Wording × Gender analyses indicated that some item wordings yielded higher rates of female than male victimization. Study 3 showed similar patterns across forms for highly victimized women. Study 4 found higher female than male victimization for a new scale and every item. Conclusion: The CTS and similar behavioral checklists are unusual in their inattention to false positives. Self-report measures designed to minimize false positives produce results consistent with other IPV methodologies; that is, they do not demonstrate gender parity. The Partner Victimization Scale, described here, can be used when a scale that has multimethod convergence with other IPV methodologies is desired. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Author's abstract). Record #6251
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
9 (RLIN) 203
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 6447
Topical term or geographic name as entry element GENDER SYMMETRY DEBATE
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
9 (RLIN) 431
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PREVALENCE
9 (RLIN) 457
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SURVEYS
9 (RLIN) 592
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name UNITED STATES
9 (RLIN) 2646
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Psychology of Violence, 2016, 6(2), 323-335.
830 ## - SERIES ADDED ENTRY--UNIFORM TITLE
Uniform title Psychology of Violence
9 (RLIN) 5489
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038207">http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038207</a>
Link text Read abstract
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Journal article
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification

No items available.