Collaborating with parents during intervention with parental agreement : (Record no. 5851)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02449nab a22002897a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151450.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180523s2018 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency AFVC
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Venables, Jemma
9 (RLIN) 7558
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Collaborating with parents during intervention with parental agreement :
Remainder of title practitioner perspectives on procedural justice
Statement of responsibility, etc Jemma Venables and Karen Healy
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Wiley,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2018
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Child & Family Social Work, 2018, Advance online publication, 16 May 2018
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc With growing concerns about the efficacy and costs of intrusive child protection interventions and increasing recognition of citizen rights to participation in governance, jurisdictions are looking to collaborative alternatives that divert families from the courts and out‐of‐home care. In Queensland (Australia), “intervention with parental agreement” (IPA) is one such response. Under IPA, the statutory child protection authority can work collaboratively with families, without a court order, to respond to children assessed as “in need of protection.” In this paper, we use procedural justice theory as a lens to explore how IPA policy is enacted in practice. Procedural justice relates to the quality of treatment a person receives and the fairness of the process than an authority uses during decision‐making (Tyler, 2006). It is associated with voluntary cooperation and compliance; key practice concerns when working to address child maltreatment via parental agreement rather than court ordered intervention. We report on a qualitative study that utilized semistructured, in‐depth interviews to capture the perceptions of 30 practitioners regarding the factors that shape the extent to which they enact IPA policy in a procedurally fair manner. Strategies for enhancing procedurally just enactment of IPA policy in practice are discussed. (Authors' abstract). Record #5851
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 103
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CHILD ABUSE
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CHILD PROTECTION
9 (RLIN) 118
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element INTERVENTION
9 (RLIN) 326
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PARENTS
9 (RLIN) 430
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE
9 (RLIN) 562
650 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SOCIAL SERVICES
9 (RLIN) 555
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name AUSTRALIA
9 (RLIN) 2597
651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name QUEENSLAND
9 (RLIN) 4140
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Healy, Karen
9 (RLIN) 1324
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Child & Family Social Work, 2018, Advance online publication, 16 May 2018
830 ## - SERIES ADDED ENTRY--UNIFORM TITLE
Uniform title Child & Family Social Work
9 (RLIN) 4703
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12578">https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12578</a>
Link text Read abstract
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Journal article

No items available.