Just who do we think children are? : (Record no. 2620)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 03196nam a2200277Ia 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | 113694 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250625151218.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 110331s2007 eng |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
Original cataloging agency | WSS |
Modifying agency | AFV |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Debski, Sophie |
9 (RLIN) | 1038 |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Just who do we think children are? : |
Remainder of title | an analysis of submissions to the Justice and Electoral Select Committee, 2006 |
Statement of responsibility, etc | Debski, Sophie; Buckley, Sue; Russell, Marie Louise |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc | Wellington |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc | Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington |
Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2007 |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Extent | 62 p. ; computer file : PDF format (426Kb) |
365 ## - TRADE PRICE | |
Price type code | 00 |
Price amount | 0 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc | This report discusses a research project that examined a sample of submissions made to the Justice and Electoral Select Committee in 2006 on the Crimes (Abolition of Force as a Justification for Child Discipline) Amendment Bill. Five groups were classified from an initial reading of 1716 submissions. These were: individual submissions in favour of the Bill; individual submissions opposed to the Bill; organisational submissions in favour of the Bill; organisational submissions opposed to the Bill; and unclear or unknown. A random sample of 170 submissions was extracted from the first four of the above groups and then analysed. The submitter's view of children, childhood, and parenthood was asked of each submission. In terms of the debate concerning physical punishment it was asked of the submissions that oppose and support physical punishment, how childhood was conceptualised by those people. The purpose of the research was to try and discover (from the submissions) if different philosophical positions existed concerning childhood, and if this was the case, whether a relationship existed between these and opinions on the Bill. Quantitative and qualitative data are reported. Two philosophical views on childhood were chosen from the literature. One was based on medical and psychological approaches which view children as 'human becomings', who are not yet competent, not yet able to reason, not yet knowledgeable, and in need of constant guidance from adults (see Qvortrup, 1994). The other view, from sociology, sees children from the perspective of what they can do and what they already are, as opposed to what they will become. This view conceptualises children as 'human beings'. It was found that a relationship existed between people's view of children and childhood, and their support for or opposition to the Bill. People who saw children as 'human becomings' were more likely to oppose the Bill and support punishment, while those who saw children as 'human beings' were more likely to support the Bill and oppose physical punishment. The authors discuss the implications of the findings for the promotion of positive parenting practices that do not use physical punishment. |
522 ## - GEOGRAPHIC COVERAGE NOTE | |
Geographic coverage note | nz |
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Source of heading or term | FVC |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | CORPORAL PUNISHMENT |
9 (RLIN) | 158 |
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ATTITUDES |
9 (RLIN) | 70 |
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Source of heading or term | FVC |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | DISCIPLINE |
9 (RLIN) | 198 |
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LAW REFORM |
9 (RLIN) | 338 |
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
Geographic name | NEW ZEALAND |
9 (RLIN) | 2588 |
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Buckley, Sue |
9 (RLIN) | 846 |
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Russell, Marie Louise |
9 (RLIN) | 2042 |
856 4# - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="http://www.victoria.ac.nz/hsrc/reports/downloads/children_23_April.pdf">http://www.victoria.ac.nz/hsrc/reports/downloads/children_23_April.pdf</a> |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
Koha item type | Report |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vine library | Vine library | 24/08/2012 | Online | ON12080387 | 24/08/2012 | 24/08/2012 | Access online |