Family mediation - evaluation of the pilot (Record no. 2611)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 04862nam a2200421Ia 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 113329
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151217.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 110331s2007 eng
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 0478290330
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency WSS
Modifying agency AFV
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 346.930 BAR
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Barwick, Helena
9 (RLIN) 758
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Family mediation - evaluation of the pilot
Statement of responsibility, etc prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Helena Barwick and Alison Gray
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Wellington, New Zealand :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Ministry of Justice,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2007
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 91 p. ; computer file : PDF format (204Kb)
365 ## - TRADE PRICE
Price type code 00
Price amount 0
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc This report discusses an evaluation of the family mediation pilot that was developed in response to the Law Commission's 2003 report "Dispute Resolution in the Family Court". The Law Commission recommended that non-judge led mediation be introduced as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism in the Family Court. In the pilot, family mediation was available to parties involved in day-to-day care, contact and guardianship proceedings. Family mediation is based on an inclusive model and has several aims which include: to provide assistance to parties to develop their own solutions in relation to their children's care; to resolve disputes faster; and to provide for the participation of children in the decision-making process. The study was undertaken to enable the Ministry of Justice to identify any implementation issues, assess the experiences of various participants (including their satisfaction with the process), and to assess the costs of the pilot. It was piloted in North Shore, Hamilton, Porirua and Christchurch Family Courts between March 2005 and June 2006. Data was collected via document review and evaluation (associated with mediation processes), interviews, and surveys. Although 540 Family Court cases were offered family mediation during the above period, 380 (70%) were referred to mediators, and of these, a total of 257 were completed by 30 June 2006. A major focus of the evaluation was to determine why the number of referrals (expected to be 60 cases per month across the four courts) fell far short of what was estimated. Largely, this was due to lack of clarity about who was eligible for referral. There were several reasons that courts did not refer cases to mediation. One of these was when information concerning domestic violence or sexual abuse had become evident. This led to a reassessment of the appropriateness of referral. In some of the courts it was found that staff had difficulty in trying to decide what level of domestic violence made a party unsuitable for referral to family mediation. Cases involving domestic violence were referred to mediation in all four courts, but only if the perpetrator had attended an appropriate intervention programme or the violence was historical. Results indicate that there were some participants with a history of domestic violence, and that some women felt uncomfortable in terms of being in close proximity to a violent ex-partner. Where a case involved allegations of sexual abuse they were not considered appropriate for family mediation in any of the pilot courts. Cases with CYFS involvement had been referred to mediation in a few instances. However, this was seen as inappropriate because resolution is not possible without CYFS input or agreement. It was found that, in these few cases, the family court coordinator did not know CYFS were involved. It is unclear how this situation could be addressed, other than by improvement of the information sharing process between government departments. Overall, the pilot was considered successful and gave parties the opportunity to address their differences in a congenial setting outside the court, with professional support. Parties were found to improve their communication and level of cooperation in relation to their children. A number of suggestions are made for Ministry of Justice consideration, should family mediation be offered more widely. An appendix provides a comparative analysis between pilot mediations and mediations conducted prior. Record #2611
522 ## - GEOGRAPHIC COVERAGE NOTE
Geographic coverage note nz
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CONTACT (ACCESS)
9 (RLIN) 29
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CARE AND PROTECTION
9 (RLIN) 97
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CHILD NEGLECT
9 (RLIN) 114
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CHILDREN
9 (RLIN) 127
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
9 (RLIN) 203
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element FAMILIES
9 (RLIN) 238
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element FAMILY COURT
9 (RLIN) 241
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element JUSTICE
9 (RLIN) 333
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element MEDIATION
9 (RLIN) 5472
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
9 (RLIN) 502
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SOCIAL SERVICES
9 (RLIN) 555
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 431
Topical term or geographic name as entry element INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
Source of heading or term FVC
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name NEW ZEALAND
9 (RLIN) 2588
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 458
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PREVENTION
Source of heading or term FVC
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 103
Topical term or geographic name as entry element CHILD ABUSE
Source of heading or term FVC
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SEXUAL VIOLENCE
9 (RLIN) 531
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Gray, Alison
9 (RLIN) 1254
856 4# - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="http://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/report-2.pdf">http://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/report-2.pdf</a>
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Report
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type Source of classification or shelving scheme
        Vine library Vine library 24/08/2012   Online ON12080385 24/08/2012 24/08/2012 Access online  
        Vine library Vine library 16/09/2015   TRO 346.930 BAR FV15090012 16/12/2016 16/09/2015 Report Dewey Decimal Classification