Countering confusion about the Duluth Model (Record no. 2455)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02323nam a2200253Ia 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 116117
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151209.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 110331s2007 eng
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency WSS
Modifying agency AFV
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Paymar, Michael
9 (RLIN) 1883
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Countering confusion about the Duluth Model
Statement of responsibility, etc Paymar, Michael; Barnes, Graham
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs
Date of publication, distribution, etc [2007]
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 16 p.
365 ## - TRADE PRICE
Price type code 00
Price amount 0
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Date supplied by publisher
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc This article was written by researchers who have worked with the Domestic Abuse Intervention Project in Duluth, Minnesota in response to criticism of the Duluth model. The authors respond specifically to several research publications and to a number of more general criticisms of the Duluth model. The authors argue that a 2003 National Institute of Justice report ("Batter intervention programs: where do we go from here?") was flawed research that is contradicted by other better designed and more comprehensive studies. The authors also critically review Babcock, Green and Robie's 2002 meta analytic review of domestic violence treatment models, and argue that Dutton and Corvo's 2006 article ("Transforming a flawed policy: a call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice") misrepresents the Duluth curriculum. Seven other more general criticisms of the Duluth model are also addressed in the article: namely that the Duluth curriculum is shame based, doesn't account for women's violence; is not culturally appropriate for marginalised groups and relies too much on the criminal justice system; works counter to restorative justice; that the Domestic Abuse Intervention Project in Duluth is anti-marriage; discounts anger as a causal factor; and ignores psychological problems. The authors follow this with an explanation of theories about why domestic violence happens and how to stop it; what the Duluth model is and is not, and the Duluth approach to working with men who batter.
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
9 (RLIN) 203
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element OFFENDERS
9 (RLIN) 413
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element TREATMENT
9 (RLIN) 613
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 431
Topical term or geographic name as entry element INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
Source of heading or term FVC
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Barnes, Graham
9 (RLIN) 749
856 4# - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="http://www.bwjp.org/files/bwjp/files/Countering_Confusion_Duluth_Model.pdf">http://www.bwjp.org/files/bwjp/files/Countering_Confusion_Duluth_Model.pdf</a>
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Short paper
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Vine library Vine library 27/08/2012   Online ON12080397 27/08/2012 27/08/2012 Access online