''Newsmaking criminology" or "infotainment" criminology? : (Record no. 2106)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02424nab a2200289Ia 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 112433
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151152.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 110331s2004 eng
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency WSS
Modifying agency AFV
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Jeffries, Samantha
9 (RLIN) 1431
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title ''Newsmaking criminology" or "infotainment" criminology? :
Remainder of title a decontextualised, fragmented and misconstrued critique
Statement of responsibility, etc Jeffries, Samantha
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Bowen Hills, Qld.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Australian Academic Press
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2004
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 0.91666666667
365 ## - TRADE PRICE
Price type code 00
Price amount 0
490 0# - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 2004, 37(2): 286-295
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc This article is a response to Judith Buckingham's critique of the author's PhD thesis methodology and research findings, and the work of Jeffries' thesis co-supervisor, Associate Professor of Sociology, Greg Newbold, that was presented in Buckingham's article "'Newsmaking criminology' or 'infotainment' criminology?'" As such, this response contributes to the debate on gender asymmetry of domestic violence. Jeffries supports her findings through a discussion of her research. The objectives of the research were to identify if there are any gender differences in sentencing and remand outcomes; if there are any gendered criteria in sentencing and remand; and how differences may occur if they do exist. Three hundred and eighty-eight male and female sentenced offenders, between 1990 and 1997, were sampled and matched for criteria, including major statutory offence and number of charges. Results show that some gender differences exist; men are more likely to be remanded in custody and for longer periods than females. Findings also show that the criteria employed for reaching judicial outcomes appears to differ for men and women and outcomes for women are less harsh. The author also discusses the social construction of femininity and masculinity, how this impacts on perceptions of men and women as offenders, and subsequently, on judicial outcomes.
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
9 (RLIN) 203
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element GENDER
9 (RLIN) 269
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element JUSTICE
9 (RLIN) 333
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element OFFENDERS
9 (RLIN) 413
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element VICTIMS
9 (RLIN) 622
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 431
Topical term or geographic name as entry element INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
Source of heading or term FVC
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 2004, 37(2): 286-295
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/acri.37.2.286 ">http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/acri.37.2.286 </a>
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Journal article

No items available.