Gender bias, fathers' rights, domestic violence and the Family Court (Record no. 2087)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03176nab a2200349Ia 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 111095
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625151152.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 110331s2004 eng
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 1350-2778
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency WSS
Modifying agency AFV
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Davis, Wendy
9 (RLIN) 1027
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Gender bias, fathers' rights, domestic violence and the Family Court
Statement of responsibility, etc Davis, Wendy
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2004
365 ## - TRADE PRICE
Price type code 00
Price amount 0
490 0# - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Butterworths Family Law Journal
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Butterworths Family Law Journal 4(12) December 2004 : 299-312
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc This article examines the accusations of gender bias in the Family Court in New Zealand. In the 1990s, the most common claim was a gender bias against women; however, more recently the focus has shifted and accusations of a gender bias in favour of women have been increasing in volume. It is claimed that it is too easy for women to attain protection orders; that women gain these orders so as to acquire tactical advantages in custody disputes, and that large numbers of fathers are being deprived of contact with their children. These claims have achieved credibility in the courts despite a lack of quantitative or qualitative research to support them. The author points out that the easy acceptance of fathers' rights discourse, despite a lack of evidence to back up claims, indicates that a traditional bias against women within the justice system is still operating. The introduction of the Domestic Violence Act (1995) was to clarify the definition of domestic violence, and to regulate Judges' scope as to their decision-making. The author highlights that contrary to some claims, it has recently become much harder to obtain a protection order without notice, and in fact, a greater proportion of protection orders applied for without notice are being put on notice by the courts. As for whether women are using protection orders strategically, Judges have been quoted as saying they find this happening; however, the Law Commission found no evidence of this and neither did the Ministry of Justice in their research into the accusations. In addressing whether the legislation destroys relationships between parents and children, the author argues that a continued relationship with a violent parent has costs for the child. The article concludes that fathers' rights groups have influenced the attitudes of Family Courts quite strongly, and they have done so without evidence upon which to base their claims. It recommends that whilst courts and legislation need to change with society, the changes should not be based on one particular interest groups' opinions.
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
9 (RLIN) 203
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element INTERVENTION
9 (RLIN) 326
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element JUSTICE
9 (RLIN) 333
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element LEGISLATION
9 (RLIN) 346
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element OFFENDERS
9 (RLIN) 413
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROTECTION ORDERS
9 (RLIN) 470
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS
9 (RLIN) 568
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element VICTIMS
9 (RLIN) 622
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Source of heading or term FVC
Topical term or geographic name as entry element WOMEN
9 (RLIN) 645
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 431
Topical term or geographic name as entry element INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
Source of heading or term FVC
650 27 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 458
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PREVENTION
Source of heading or term FVC
651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME
Geographic name NEW ZEALAND
9 (RLIN) 2588
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Butterworths Family Law Journal 4(12) December 2004 : 299-312
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Journal article
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification

No items available.