Responding together: An integrated report evaluating the aims of the Waitakere Family Violence Court protocols Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Mandy Morgan, Leigh Coombes, Erika Te Hiwi and Sarah McGray, Massey University
Material type:
TextPublication details: Wellington, New Zealand Ministry of Justice, 2008Description: electronic document (172 pages); PDF file: 893.93 KBSubject(s): Online resources: Summary: This report draws together the findings from An Evaluation of the Waitakere Family Violence Court protocols: Preliminary report (Morgan, Coombes, & McGray, 2007), Study One, and Accounting for safety: A sample of women victims’ experiences of safety through the Waitakere Family Violence Court (Morgan, Coombes, Te Hiwi & McGray, 2007), Study Two.
The integration of these studies was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice and is the fourth product within an ongoing collaborative programme of evaluation being conducted by the researchers and stakeholders in the Waitakere Family Violence Court (WFVC). The findings of Study One and Study Two assessed the extent to which the protocols that regulate the court’s processes are effective in achieving the court’s aims. (from the Executive summary). Record #4616
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Access online
|
Vine library | Online | Available | ON15020033 |
This report draws together the findings from An Evaluation of the Waitakere Family Violence Court protocols: Preliminary report (Morgan, Coombes, & McGray, 2007), Study One, and Accounting for safety: A sample of women victims’ experiences of safety through the Waitakere Family Violence Court (Morgan, Coombes, Te Hiwi & McGray, 2007), Study Two.
The integration of these studies was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice and is the fourth product within an ongoing collaborative programme of evaluation being conducted by the researchers and stakeholders in the Waitakere Family Violence Court (WFVC). The findings of Study One and Study Two assessed the extent to which the protocols that regulate the court’s processes are effective in achieving the court’s aims. (from the Executive summary). Record #4616